Summary

Appeals panel splits citation rulings

RosevilleMar 10, 20262 min read

At a glance

Quick context to catch up fast.

The Board of Appeals granted two counts of a licensing citation and dismissed them, upheld one licensing count but waived the fine, and upheld two massage business recordkeeping citations.

Committees mentioned

Open the committee coverage hubs tied to this summary.

Board of Appeals

Topics discussed

Public SafetyCommerce

View official document

Was this summary helpful?

Your feedback helps us prioritize what to improve next.

What this means

The panel heard two separate citation appeals and reached mixed outcomes. For one case, it dismissed two licensing counts and upheld one licensing count without a fine. For the other case, it upheld two citations involving client service records for a massage business. The decisions mean the cited resident kept some violations on record, and the parties were told they could seek review in Placer County Superior Court within 20 days.

Key decisions

Follow the major takeaways from this briefing.

Granted the appeal and dismissed two counts of Roseville Municipal Code Section 7.16.010, Licensing, because the City did not prove the violations by a preponderance of the evidence.
Denied the appeal on one count of Roseville Municipal Code Section 7.16.010, Licensing, upheld the charge, and waived the fine in the interest of justice.
Denied the appeal of Administrative Citation Nos. 22063 and 22065 for Roseville Municipal Code Section 9.10.220(H), Client Service Records, first and second offenses, and upheld both citations.
Noted that the parties may file a petition for review with the Superior Court in Placer County within 20 days.

Timeline & follow-ups

Action items flagged by the community.

No follow-ups have been shared yet. Add one in the community board below.

Meeting information

Details and records from this meeting.

Board of Appeals Meeting

Mar 10, 2026, 9:00 AMElectric Building 116 S. Grant Street, First Floor Conference Roomcompleted

Agenda

I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL (SILENT)
III. IDENTIFICATION OF CHAIR
IV. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
V. PUBLIC COMMENTS
VI. SWEAR IN
VII. MATTERS TO BE HEARD
1. Appeal of Adminstrative Citation 22168 - Karina Regan
Appellant: Karina Regan, 1403 Oakmont Drive, Roseville, CA 95661 Roseville Municipal Code Section: 7.16.010, Licensing, Three Counts ($225.00) | attachments=3 | reports=1
Decision: MATTERS TO BE HEARD
2. Appeal of Administrative Citation Nos. 22063 and 22065 - Shuying Xu
Appellant: Shuying Xu, 2805 Rainer Way, Antelope, CA 95843 Roseville Municipal Code Sections: 9.10.220(H), Client Service Records ($250.00) - Citation 22063 9.10.220(H) Client Service Records, Second Offense ($500.00) - Citation 22065 | attachments=5 | reports=1
Decision: MATTERS TO BE HEARD
VIII. STAFF/BOARD REPORTS
IX. ADJOURNMENT